The Center for Community and Citizen Science and Public Lab have
received funding from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation to
explore a shared interest in discovering what effect
participating in community science has on civic engagement. The
research team – Shannon Dosemagen, Liz Barry, Gretchen Gehrke
from Public Lab, and Dr. Heidi Ballard, Meg Pannkuk, Erin Bird
from CCS – has broadly focused on answering the following:
under what conditions, and through what mechanisms, can
engagement in science lead individuals and community groups to
become involved in larger social or environmental issues and
civic actions? In order to research this subject, the team
developed three research questions:
- In what ways do participants engage with the Public Lab
co-created toolkits on frac sand mining or wetland monitoring?
- What evidence is there of science learning for civic
engagement (framed here as environmental science agency) by
participants?
- In what ways does Public Lab foster science learning for
civic engagement in the cases of frac sand and wetland monitoring
issues?
In this project we are focusing on two Public Lab toolkits:
Frac Sand- This toolkit introduces individuals to frac sand
issues and particle pollution, specifically, industrial sand
mining. Its goal is to connect concerned community members,
hardware developers, and scientists while providing resources for
monitoring particulate matter, reporting pollution, and engaging
in advocacy.
Wetlands- The wetlands toolkit was designed for anyone who
lives near a wetland or is concerned about wetland health. The
purpose of this toolkit is to provide information on what
wetlands do, how wetland health is measured, and how we can help
restore wetlands. Additionally, this toolkit gives individuals
hands-on experience with research, map-making, advocacy
techniques, etc.
Our project looked to understand how individuals interact
with the toolkits, and with each other. We wanted to understand
how individuals are using the Public Lab community to engage in
science and civic engagement; the contents of the toolkits are
only one small piece of the larger picture. To better understand
the interactions surrounding these toolkits we interviewed a
total of 37 individuals who have a wide range of experiences
interacting with the toolkits and with the Public Lab community.
We asked them about what they did in the context of environmental
monitoring projects, how they interacted with Public Lab, how
they understood science, and if and how they engaged in civic
activities, among many other questions.
Along with looking at how and why participants are engaging with
Public Lab, community science, and civic activities, this project
also hoped to answer the question: What successful aspects
of the Public Lab model are replicable and scalable, and what
audiences are most appropriate to reach with this model? For this
last piece, Dr Heidi Ballard and Erin Bird, PhD candidate in
Science and Agricultural Education at UC
Davis, worked to draw lessons from this study together
with literature pertaining to K-12 community and citizen science
to create recommendations for furthering Public Lab’s reach.
About Public Lab
The Public Laboratory for Open Technology and Science (Public
Lab) is a community — supported by a 501(c)3 non-profit — which
develops and applies open-source tools to environmental
exploration and investigation. By democratizing inexpensive and
accessible Do-It-Yourself techniques, Public Lab creates a
collaborative network of practitioners who actively re-imagine
the human relationship with the environment. Visit PublicLab.org
and follow @PublicLab.
This project is funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.